
Main
Menu
Arkansas
State Journals
Arkansas House Journal
|
Page 3
Click Image To View JPEG Image

267
not proposed by legal authority but in palpable
violation of the Constitution
The doctrine that a State cannot secede was maintained by
force of arms – that a state of the Union is always and of the
United States and the people thereof amenable to its laws and
therefore Arkansas has and is now entitled to all rights
guaranteed by the Constitution
At a certain period the representatives were withdrawn from
the national council and there was for a time a voluntary
suspension of the relations of the State to the United States.
Subsequently the State sought
to resume their relations by sending members of Congress
possessing the qualifications required by law to again
participate in the legislation of the country
This privilege was not conceded and they were excluded from
their seats by the voice of a dominant political majority and
not permitted to take part in the formation of the Amendment
propos- ed From the
facts recited, it is evident that it is not before this body
under the authority contemplated by the Constitution having
known the illegality of its presentation and protesting
against the Congressional exercise of powers not inferred by
law as inconsistency with the equality and dignity and
distinction of the sovereignty of the State. Your committee
express the opin- ion that it should be a fact(?) upon and
will briefly present the reasons which influence them in
recom- mending its rejection.
The first section declares who are to be citizens of the
United States and of the several states taking from the latter
a power now exercised by them in determining who shall enjoy
that political right. The Negro is embraced and the States
prohibited from abridging his immunities as a citizen of the
United States which Amendment, Congress with authority do
define what rights he shall enjoy and by legila- tive
enactments elevate him to a political equality with the White
race It also transfers to Congress jurisdiction of the local
and internal affairs of the states virtually destroying the
independence of their courts and centralizing their reserved
powers in the Federal Government.
The second section would entirely revolution- ize the basis of
representation unless the elective
|
|